Not easy to know what to say after what happened last week at the polls in the United States. It is tragedy. It is nightmare. Here I note that it is also farce.

Click here for a half-minute video meditation on the return to power of Donald J. Trump.

      As we’ve gotten older, so has our metabolism. That’s why we’ve all probably gained some weight since the days when we could actually fit into our old college sweatshirt.

      Metabolism, as we all well know, is the sum of the chemical reactions in the body's cells that changes food into energy. When your metabolism slows and it and you can sometimes barely get out the door in time for a 2 p.m. urologist appointment, it’s time to think about dieting.

      I mean, we could, of course, eat a bit less, but that may be too complicated. So, instead, we have several popular dieting plans that many of us follow. . . .

     In reverse order of terribleness: 

7.  Reagan defeats Mondale 1984. President Ronald Reagan seemed astoundingly lucky. He had survived a deep recession, which knocked out inflation, and then benefited from a booming economy. Walter Mondale, a fine senator, seemed miscast as a presidential candidate and hurt by having served as vice president in the seemingly mostly unsuccessful Carter administration. The result of this election was not surprising.

6.  Nixon defeats Humphrey 1968. Richard Nixon’s awfulness was manifest. Nonetheless, it was difficult to get too upset over this election because we were so unexcited about the guy who lost: Vice President Hubert Humphrey, who, while a committed liberal, proved unwilling to break with President Lyndon Johnson on the Vietnam War.

5. Reagan defeats Carter 1980 . . . .

As I approach my ninth decade, and, supposedly, increased wisdom, there are still things I just don’t understand.

• I don’t understand pineapple on pizza.

• I don’t understand Barry Manilow.

• I don’t understand how Donald Trump could have once been our president.

• I don’t understand daylight savings time.

• I don’t understand how to pronounce correctly the Greek word for thanks.

• I don’t understand why so many people are suddenly gluten intolerant.

• I don’t understand how, four years ago, 74 million people voted for a man who would foment an insurrection. . . .

      For much of my life, when I looked around a room, I would be pleased if I could convince myself, as I could upon occasion, that I was one of the younger people there.

      There were two reasons for this, both kind of obvious, but let me—since what I’m about to say is less obvious—spell them out:

• ·       First, there was the satisfaction of having accomplished something—something that qualified me for entry into that room—that people more experienced than I had accomplished.

• ·       And, second, I felt in some way more vital, less stuck in the past, than the venerable people around me in that room.

      I was, in other words, a bit of a youth chauvinist. Common enough then and now. Nothing too weird about that, right?

      What’s weird, what’s not so obvious, is that when I look around a room nowadays, I sometimes find myself enjoying being one of the older people in that room. I take a certain satisfaction in being one of the wrinkled. . . .

      What a F%#king Sh*T Show!

      Ok, I am glad I got that off my chest.    

      How in the world did our country get it so wrong!

      Are we really that stupid?

     Is it true that 52% of adults read at only a sixth-grade level?  Maybe that’s it.   Why did 54% of  white women vote for him but 93% of black women voted for Kamala?  Why would any women vote for a regime that wants to demean us, demoralize us, abuse us, defy our rights, and grab us by our pussies any time they want . . . .

      If there is any bright spot in the election of an ignorant criminal traitor as President of the United States—and the companion election of  a Republican Senate (and at this writing, even a GOP House) it is that Democrats finally may get their heads out of their butts and form a political coalition that includes everyone, not just people who look and act like me.

       Maybe the best quote I saw postmortem was this from an unnamed Democrat, quoted in the WashPost:

        “I will say this,” one House Democrat said. “The Democratic Party has a major working-class voter issue. It started a decade ago as a working-class White issue. It’s now gotten even worse and spread across racial lines.” . . .

     No.
     No, no, no.
     Seven time zones away, seven hours later in the day, we awoke to the inconceivable news.
     We had gone to bed with hope that America was the America we believed in. We woke to find that we lived in a very different America.
     We saw first that North Carolina, our state, had, for the third consecutive time voted for the pathological.
     We saw next that Georgia had gone down the same horrible path, then Pennsylvania. We had just finished breakfast when the last of the dominoes fell.
     We clicked on the Times website and read that in every state that had counted its votes, Trump had improved on his performance of 2020. How was that possible? How could memories be so short? . . .

      Some months ago, we ranked the presidential elections of our lifetime in order of how consequential we believe they were or would prove to be—consequential in a good or bad way. For that list, with explanations, click here. Here is the election we selected back then as the most consequential.

#1  2024  Trump versus Harris. This is the only election on this list upon which we do not yet have the benefit of hindsight. And it must be kept in mind that it is always easy to see the current election as among the most consequential ever. However, we do have reason to believe that Trump’s far-right backers might be less ineffectual this time—as evidenced by their “Project 2025.”  And he, or his family–as evidenced by the 2021 attack on the Capitol–might, if they gain power, never agree to peacefully surrender it. 

      And the short version of the other rankings: #20 1976 Carter defeats Ford. #19 2012 Obama defeats Romney. #18 1956 Eisenhower defeats Stevenson. #17 1992 Clinton defeats Bush. #16 1948 Truman defeats Dewey. #15 1996 Clinton defeats Dole. #14 1960 Kennedy defeats Nixon. #13 1984 Reagan defeats Mondale. #12 1952 Eisenhower defeats Stevenson. #11 1988 Bush defeats Dukakis. #10 2004 Bush defeats Kerry. #9 1968 Nixon defeats Humphrey. #8 2008 Obama defeats McCain. #7 1972 Nixon defeats McGovern. #6 2020 Biden defeats Trump. #5 1980 Reagan defeats Carter. #4 2016 Trump defeats Clinton. #3 1964 Johnson defeats Goldwater. #2 2000 Bush defeats Gore.

Most politicians try to make their opponents seem inept and threatening. But no politician in recent memory has falsely demonized his opponents to the extent that Donald Trump has.

 —Can we on this day, Election Day, bring at least a modicum of civility back to American politics by defeating Donald Trump?

 _______________________

Yes, the attacks by the Harris campaign on Donald Trump have also been unusually sharp. But those attacks have been supported by many of those who worked with the former president during his first term—including his vice president. 

—Can we on this day, Election Day, reject the presidential aspirations of a former president who was called “fascist to the core” by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under him, who was said by his own chief of staff to have praised Adolf Hitler? . . .

      There was a time, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when Americans traveling abroad wore maple leaf pins. The idea, of course, was to be taken as Canadians, not that country responsible for the reprehensible Vietnam war.
      We are traveling abroad now, and I wish I had that pin. I wish we didn’t represent the country that might be electing a sociopath.

       We’re not the only country, of course, facing a rising fascist wave. And the wave has already crested in places like Hungary. But we are the country that used to tout itself as the bastion of democracy, of freedom.

       And where we may be heading seems more than scary and inconceivable. It seems embarrassing. It seems humiliating. . . .

      Whatever the outcome of this election – and I damn well hope Democrats win – Kamala Harris deserves America’s thanks.  She’s been called stupid, a whore and the C word, and asked if she’s really black.  She’s been dissed by some Democrats I know as a tepid candidate, not quite the lesser of two evils since the other guys is so evil but nonetheless maybe not quite up to the job of being our next president and maybe not the best candidate who might have led the Democratic ticket.

      I’d like to say something else: “Thank you, Kamala.” You were forced into a presidential race at breakneck speed by a president who had no business seeking a second term and by a White House staff that presumably helped hide that fact. You had to deal with racism and sexism that were inevitable for anyone nominated to be the first black woman to lead a major party in the race for the presidency. And you had to do all of this while running against a cult figure I can’t describe as anything other than a mob boss, who threatens people, and lies often and with impunity. And yet you, Kamala, are on the brink of history, the cusp of victory. . . .

      The days are dwindling down, but not the worries. In fact, they seem to be mounting as we get closer and closer to election day.
      Maybe it’s because the closer we get the more unreal it seems that he could actually win. Haven’t people, enough people, seen enough, heard enough?
      Don’t they know what happened at the New York rally in Madison Square Garden? Don’t they care? If there are still undecided voters now, what at this point could possibly help them decide? Why haven’t they decided, why haven’t they made the only reasonable decision? . . .

     Today I’m thinking about hair, and I don’t mean the hippie musical.

       I am talking about the stuff that grows out of our heads. Something happens to our hair as we age.

       First and foremost, the color changes to a drab and unappealing grey or a brassy bright white. My husband’s hair is still brown but he lost most of it in his twenties. I think that is an ok tradeoff.

       I used to have a terrific head of hair which I rarely coiffed or fussed about. Being a hippie, I grew my hair long and natural. That said, my hair turned white in my late thirties. I began to color it a yellow blond for the next twenty years.

       When I hit my sixties I gave up and just let it go full white. Luckily, I have hard water from our natural spring which is full of minerals, and it gives my hair a yellow-green glow. I also rub amber on my hair, which tones down the brassiness and makes me smell yummy. . . .

A two minute video on:

Loch Ness,

Donald Trump

and the philosopher David Hume’s test for distinguishing truth from superstition and lies.

Filmed in Scotland.

      So, the question is: “What was your worst job ever?”  Certainly, it’s a subject that triggers memories, reflections and musings, but what if you don’t really have a worst job ever?

      I’d guess that my first job was when I was about eight years old, assigned to clean up my room. There certainly were some things about that job that I didn’t like, including picking up toys and clothes and putting them away, and prohibiting me from going in to the TV room, resulting in my missing some of my favorite cartoons.  (No option to record a program in 1958.) 

      But there were also benefits, including learning shortcuts to cleaning up a room that avoided the tedious organizational norms. I’d say the benefits outweighed the disadvantages.

      Then, a few years later, I was assigned the job of being a patrol boy, wearing a patrol belt and helping little kids cross a street at a designated corner. …

     On Election Day, the day the future of this country will be decided, I’ll be nearly 6,000 miles away. On the day we decide whether we are, in fact, going to continue being a democracy, I’ll be in the land where democracy was born.

      It will be weird.

      If we can stay up late—say, for us, maybe to midnight—it will only be 5 p.m. on the east coast of the U.S. No polls will have closed, no voting finished. When the last polls in the U.S. close on Election Day, at midnight Eastern Standard Time, it will be 7 a.m. the next day on the island of Crete, in Greece.

      I’m sure the Greeks will be paying attention, as will the whole world. But with the time difference and 6,000 miles of distance, everybody won’t be glued anxiously to CNN, watching the votes trickling in, listening to Wolf Blitzer and the others call, we hope, Pennsylvania for Harris, or Michigan too close to call, or what the early signs are looking like in Arizona. . . .

      The black pickup cruised down Route 28 in Falmouth, MA, heading East, windows wide open, boom box blaring.

       “They’re eating the dogs. They’re eating the cats,” the pro-Trump rapper chanted as the car drifted by.

      It was all part of Saturday’s political carnival at one the town’s busiest intersections.

      Mind you, I live in a blue town in one of the country’s bluest states. But you'd never have known it Saturday at the intersection of Route 28 and Worcester Court. I joined other Democrats holding signs for Harris-Walz and statewide candidates from 10 a.m. to noon.

      But often we were outflanked, and sometimes outnumbered, by a group called Women for Trump, who arrived with MAGA flags, a bull horn and the encouragement of lots of horn-honking and yelling supporters, who drove by and sometimes doubled back to cheer them on again.

      Part of me saw this as ominous. It’s clear Trump supporters are angry, aggressive and motivated this year.  But I could see it as a positive, too. . . .

A plea

—in the form of a short video—

for Americans to reject Donald Trump

as decidedly and frighteningly unAmerican.

Click here for video.

      “. . . .Any respect or affection I had for the Washington Post as an institution vanished today after owner Jeff Bezos—a billionaire who loves money more than journalistic integrity—ordered his editorial staff to kill a proposed endorsement of Democrat Kamala Harris—a move that sparked outrage in the Post’s newsroom.

      Instead, the paper lifted a figurative fig leaf over its shriveled genitals, saying it would remain neutral in this, the most important presidential election since the Civil War. . . .”